Company Updates

400 newspapers pause OpenAI, Microsoft copyright case pending MDL resolution

Share
400 newspapers pause OpenAI, Microsoft copyright case pending MDL resolution

A lawsuit filed by 400 newspapers against OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged unauthorized scraping of copyrighted content has been paused pending resolution of motions in a broader case against tech companies. The news outlets, led by Richner Communications, are seeking compensation for the use of their content in AI training.

TL;DR

  • A lawsuit by 400 newspapers against OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged unauthorized scraping of copyrighted content has been paused.
  • The case has been consolidated into broader multidistrict litigation involving similar cases.

What happened

In June 2026, 400 newspapers, led by Richner Communications, sued OpenAI and Microsoft for allegedly scraping their copyrighted works without authorization or compensation to train AI programs.

The lawsuit has been consolidated into multidistrict litigation involving numerous similar cases, according to a joint stipulation and order filed on July 14, 2026, in the US District for the Southern District of New York.

Why it matters

This pause highlights the growing legal challenges faced by AI companies regarding the use of copyrighted material in training datasets.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how AI companies handle copyrighted content, impacting both developers and investors in the AI industry.

Key facts

  • The lawsuit involves 400 newspapers led by Richner Communications.
  • OpenAI and Microsoft are accused of scraping copyrighted works without authorization.
  • The case has been consolidated into broader multidistrict litigation.
  • The joint stipulation and order were filed on July 14, 2026, in the US District for the Southern District of New York.
  • The lawsuit seeks compensation for the use of copyrighted content in AI training.

Context

This case is part of a broader trend of legal challenges against AI companies for the use of copyrighted material in training datasets.

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the AI industry, particularly in how companies handle copyrighted content.

Topics

Related coverage

Join the discussion

Have a take on this story? Weigh in with our community on Facebook.

💬 Discuss on Facebook →